Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video111.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Schmid results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 41.186 hits. Analysis detected 315.847 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,699 of 28,364 speakers). This Carl Schmid is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Carl Schmid
Speaker details