Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including No True Scotsman and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (782 of 37,389 speakers). This Cameron is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Cameron
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠98%Cameron (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos