Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Energy Commission results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (513 of 22,688 speakers). This California Energy Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
California Energy Commission
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠98%California Energy Commission (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos