Speaker summary
ā 27%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burgum results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ā 41% (16,823 of 28,364 speakers). This Burgum is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Burgum
Speaker details