Speaker summary
ā 64%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruno David results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (8,488 of 28,364 speakers). This Bruno David is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Bruno David
Speaker details