Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos669.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brent Sadler results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 2,201.086 faulty-reasoning hits from 669.667 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (33,817 of 40,165 speakers). This Brent Sadler is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Brent Sadler
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠16%Brent Sadler (selected)12%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 669.667
Video count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
11.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos669.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Dunning-Kruger EffectSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 2.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos