Speaker summary
47%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Gill results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (387 of 19,386 speakers). This Brendan Gill is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Brendan Gill
Speaker details