Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bree Nielson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 37.125 hits. Analysis detected 156.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Bree Nielson is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Bree Nielson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%Bree Nielson (selected)43%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos