Speaker summary
ā 99%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 99% (670 of 37,909 speakers). This Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law
Speaker details