Speaker summary
71%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Network for Human Rights results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including In-Group Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 20 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (640 of 37,708 speakers). This Border Network for Human Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Border Network for Human Rights
Speaker details