Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Board of Appeals officials results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (623 of 37,734 speakers). This Board of Appeals officials is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Board of Appeals officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠99%Board of Appeals officials (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos