Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Wells results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Personal Incredulity, and Anecdotal, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 286.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (13,240 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Wells is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Bill Wells
Speaker details