Speaker summary
99%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biden administration EPA results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (588 of 37,797 speakers). This Biden administration EPA is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Biden administration EPA
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
99%Biden administration EPA (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos