Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video79.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Chevat results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 73.875 hits. Analysis detected 251.069 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of 60% (11,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Benjamin Chevat is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Benjamin Chevat
Speaker details