Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (12,985 of 28,364 speakers). This Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Speaker details