Speaker summary
100%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Denard results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (461 of 37,937 speakers). This Austin Denard is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Austin Denard
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
99%Austin Denard (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos