Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General Letitia James results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (452 of 38,676 speakers). This Attorney General Letitia James is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Attorney General Letitia James
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠99%Attorney General Letitia James (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos