Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Association for the Right to Die With Dignity results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,698 of 19,785 speakers). This Association for the Right to Die With Dignity is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Association for the Right to Die With Dignity
Speaker details