Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assal Rad results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 85.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,399 of 23,950 speakers). This Assal Rad is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Assal Rad
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠82%Assal Rad (selected)86%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%55th Civil District Court Judge Lotosha Lewis Payne100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos