Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video16.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artak Avagyan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 16.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 71% (8,405 of 28,364 speakers). This Artak Avagyan is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Artak Avagyan
Speaker details