Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video113.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anya Hurwitz results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 69.4% saturation with 88.5 hits. Analysis detected 232.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 113.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (18,306 of 45,135 speakers). This Anya Hurwitz is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Anya Hurwitz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠60%Anya Hurwitz (selected)39%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 113.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
38.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos113.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 69.4%69.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 69.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos