Speaker summary
100%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These anti-AIPAC advocacy group results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (253 of 24,629 speakers). This anti-AIPAC advocacy group is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
anti-AIPAC advocacy group
Speaker details