Speaker summary
100%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Paulina Lina results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (215 of 20,994 speakers). This Anna Paulina Lina is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Anna Paulina Lina
Speaker details