Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video80.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Simpson results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 80.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 69.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (8,106 of 41,716 speakers). This Ann Simpson is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Ann Simpson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠81%Ann Simpson (selected)70%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 80.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
69.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos80.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.6%69.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.6%69.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos