Speaker summary
46%2 analyzed articles/videos106.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angie Mummaw results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80.2% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 71% (8,384 of 28,364 speakers). This Angie Mummaw is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Angie Mummaw
Speaker details