Speaker summary
71%2 analyzed articles/videos21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Tettenborn results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 14 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (330 of 39,004 speakers). This Andrew Tettenborn is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Andrew Tettenborn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
100%Andrew Tettenborn (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos