Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew McCown results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 29.25 hits. Analysis detected 104.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,203 of 45,120 speakers). This Andrew McCown is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Andrew McCown
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Andrew McCown (selected)42%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
41.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 53.1%53.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 46.9%46.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos