Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video2,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Bell results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,002 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,670 of 28,364 speakers). This Ana Bell is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Ana Bell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠3%Ana Bell (selected)5%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 2,002
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos