Speaker summary
59%1 analyzed article/video175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amos Barshad results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 791.488 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,429 of 28,364 speakers). This Amos Barshad is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Amos Barshad
Speaker details