Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amodei warns results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (316 of 43,286 speakers). This Amodei warns is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Amodei warns
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠100%Amodei warns (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos