Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allie Bond results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (12,219 of 45,107 speakers). This Allie Bond is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Allie Bond
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠73%Allie Bond (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos