Speaker summary
68%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Albert Chow results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 274.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of 56% (12,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Albert Chow is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Albert Chow
Speaker details