Speaker summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Security Institute results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 257 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (36,873 of 45,122 speakers). This AI Security Institute is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
AI Security Institute
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠19%AI Security Institute (selected)13%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 257
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
12.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos257 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos