Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adriane Casalotti results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including In-Group Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (115 of 45,145 speakers). This Adriane Casalotti is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Adriane Casalotti
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠100%Adriane Casalotti (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos