Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (80 of 37,328 speakers). This Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠100%Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos