Publication summary
52%7 analyzed articles/videos1,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WDIV results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 6,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,427 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 38% (209 of 334 publications). This WDIV is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
WDIV
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
1%Berkeleyside2%
2%The Colorado Sun2%
38%WDIV (selected)2%
99%KESQ9%
100%The White House9%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
WDIV attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
WDIV vs sitewide
WDIV attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.