Author summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Burkhart results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (1,130 of 5,694 authors). This Christina Burkhart is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Christina Burkhart
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠81%Christina Burkhart (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 612
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Christina Burkhart attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Christina Burkhart vs sitewide
Christina Burkhart attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos