Publication summary
81% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streetsblog NYC results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,315 hits . Analysis detected 11,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,384 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (246 of 548 publications). This Streetsblog NYC is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 15,384
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst