Author summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Lipstein results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,296 of 8,503 authors). This Emily Lipstein is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Emily Lipstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠85%Emily Lipstein (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,268
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emily Lipstein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emily Lipstein vs sitewide
Emily Lipstein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos