Publication summary
48%2 analyzed articles/videos1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Report results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 3,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,789 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 77% (85 of 353 publications). This San Antonio Report is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
San Antonio Report
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
1%Berkeleyside2%
2%The Colorado Sun2%
77%San Antonio Report (selected)3%
99%KESQ9%
100%The White House9%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 3,789
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
San Antonio Report attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
San Antonio Report vs sitewide
San Antonio Report attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.