Publication summary
⁠62%3 analyzed articles/videos1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Landing results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 670 hits. Analysis detected 4,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,301 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (93 of 323 publications). This Houston Landing is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Houston Landing
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠1%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠2%Houston Chronicle2%
⁠72%Houston Landing (selected)3%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 5,301
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Houston Landing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Houston Landing vs sitewide
Houston Landing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos