Publication summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos2,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Observer results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 955 hits. Analysis detected 5,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,371 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (172 of 353 publications). This Dallas Observer is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Dallas Observer
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠52%Dallas Observer (selected)3%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 7,371
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dallas Observer attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dallas Observer vs sitewide
Dallas Observer attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos