Author summary
53%1 analyzed article/video875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Wood results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 2,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,625 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,282 of 5,885 authors). This Austin Wood is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Austin Wood
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Austin Wood attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Austin Wood vs sitewide
Austin Wood attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.