Publication summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos3,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Reader results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 6,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,841 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (288 of 341 publications). This Chicago Reader is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Chicago Reader
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠2%Berkeleyside2%
⁠16%Chicago Reader (selected)2%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 11,841
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chicago Reader attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chicago Reader vs sitewide
Chicago Reader attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos