Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These CalMatters results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 556 publications). This CalMatters is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 5,048
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst