Publication summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belt Magazine results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,828 hits . Analysis detected 15,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,408 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 53% (278 of 584 publications). This Belt Magazine is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 22,408
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst