Keyword summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video2,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Senate results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 431 hits. Analysis detected 2,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,509 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (30,954 of 31,728 keywords). This Wisconsin Senate is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠3%Wisconsin Senate (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,509
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wisconsin Senate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wisconsin Senate vs sitewide
Wisconsin Senate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos