Keyword summary
34%1 analyzed article/video871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Risks results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 1,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (21,228 of 50,635 keywords). This Wildfire Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Wildfire Risks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildfire Risks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildfire Risks vs sitewide
Wildfire Risks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.