Keyword summary
37%1 analyzed article/video1,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Protections results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 1,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,641 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (41,856 of 44,654 keywords). This Wildfire Protections is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Wildfire Protections
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildfire Protections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildfire Protections vs sitewide
Wildfire Protections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.