Keyword summary
ā 96%1 analyzed article/video464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents Association Dinner results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (5,199 of 33,961 keywords). This White House Correspondents Association Dinner is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
White House Correspondents Association Dinner
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Correspondents Association Dinner attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Correspondents Association Dinner vs sitewide
White House Correspondents Association Dinner attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.